[ntp:questions] Re: ntp + ppskit + oncore M12+ - I'm getting closer! :)
Ulrich Windl
Ulrich.Windl at RZ.Uni-Regensburg.DE
Wed Aug 27 11:35:07 UTC 2003
Still wondering: In your previous article the kernel flags did not
show that the kernel PLL is using the PPS info. I still don't know how
the Oncore driver handles PPS, but I might guess that your ntpd runs
without the additional blessings from PPS.
Regards,
Ulrich
Ryan <googlegroups at draziwDOTnet.net> writes:
> Many more hours of running - looks like my offset runs .020 to .035 most
> of the time. Also looks like I'm off by ~4ms (?) vs some fairly solid
> S1 servers. Any tips? (Improving accuracy, and why I'm off so much
> from good servers? - and anything else to optimize without installing
> *bsd. ;) )
>
> Thanks,
> Ryan
>
> ntpq -p
> remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset
> jitter
> ==============================================================================
> LOCAL(0) LOCAL(0) 10 l 37 64 377 0.000 0.000
> 0.015
> *GPS_ONCORE(0) .GPS. 0 l 15 16 377 0.000 -0.048
> 0.015
> -bb1-l0.snfc21.p tick.usno.navy. 2 u 20 64 377 35.293 4.196
> 0.526
> +time.nist.gov .ACTS. 1 u 58 64 377 56.302 4.434
> 0.173
> +timekeeper.isi. .GPS. 1 u 59 64 377 26.242 4.438
> 0.433
> -tick.ucla.edu .PSC. 1 u 5 64 367 28.422 4.985
> 0.312
>
> .
More information about the questions
mailing list