[ntp:questions] Re: Clock type 30 invalid?
Richard B. Gilbert
rgilbert88 at comcast.net
Thu Jan 22 13:05:18 UTC 2004
We don't have PPSAPI!!!!!
sunblok_# grep PPSAPI config.h
/* #undef HAVE_PPSAPI */
Shouldn't this mean that we don't need timepps.h?
refclock_oncore.o is being built; AFAIK, without errors. It's only when
we try to use it that we see a problem!
Tonight I'll try:
make clean
./configure --enable-oncore
make >build.log
and scan build.log for errors in building the driver (or any other errors).
Harlan Stenn wrote:
>In article <GKydnWUo-9g1zZLdRVn-iQ at comcast.com>,
>Richard B. Gilbert <rgilbert88 at comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Harlan,
>>
>>Where does it say that the the PPSAPI is required?
>>
>>
>
>Line 87 of refclock_oncore.c .
>
>
>
>>Looking at the code, I see a lot of #ifdef HAVE_PPSAPI statements.
>>Don't these mean that IF you have PPSAPI you do A otherwise you do B?
>>
>>
>
>Yes.
>
>
>
>>I also don't see where timepps.h is required. It's that #ifdef again;
>>if you have it, do A, else do B.
>>
>>
>
>That's because HAVE_PPSAPI does not tell us which header to use. If we
>HAVE_PPSAPI then we expect a timepps.h header and trust that one will
>be provided.
>
>If you remove the offending bit from the end of line 87 and the result
>works for you, please open an issue at http://bugzilla.ntp.org and I
>expect we'll get this fixed pronto.
>
>H
>
>
More information about the questions
mailing list