[ntp:questions] Re: NTP 4.1.72 on W2K
Richard B. Gilbert
rgilbert88 at comcast.net
Thu Oct 28 03:06:33 UTC 2004
>Hi all, I am using Windows NT GUI installation
>(http://www.five-ten-sg.com/util/ntp4172.zip) on a Windows 2K server SP4 to
>synchronize some equipments on the LAN to UTC time.
>The W2K server ntp.conf file contents are.
>server 220.127.116.11 iburst prefer
>fudge 18.104.22.168 stratum 0 refid INET
>fudge 127.127.1.0 stratum 3 refid LCL
>LAN equipments are synchronized with this W2K server, which is correctly
>synchronized to UTC.
>If I disconnect Internet access during 2 or 3 days I see that all LAN
>equipments remain synchronized with the W2K server. But after restoring
>Internet access again, I see that the W2K server was not synchronized with
>UTC. It was several seconds (sometimes minutes) advanced to UTC. I would
>like to keep machines synchronized to UTC although there is an Internet
>access failure during 2 or 3 days.
>Is it possible that the clock of a PC is so inaccurate? Even an old
>mechanical clock performs better!
>Has anybody noticed this behaviour before?
>Any idea or suggestion to solve this matter is welcomed!
Welcome to the wonderful world of PC clocks and Windows. Face it!
Computers were not designed to act as accurate clocks! Given the amount
spent (about $2 US) per PC, it's a miracle that they keep time as well
as they do. The Windows operating system was not designed to keep time
either! You can mitigate the clock drift somewhat by keeping the
temperature and the supply voltage stable. You probably cannot make the
clock stable enough to keep time accurate time for two days without
If you need better time than you are getting, either get a stable
internet connection or buy a hardware reference clock! You might also
be able to mitigate the problem by entrusting your timekeeping to an
operating system somewhat better equipped to keep time than Windows (and
I don't mean Linux). Solaris 8, Intel Platform Edition does a
reasonable job of keeping time on a PC. I've never tried Free BSD but
some people think highly of it.
More information about the questions