[ntp:questions] Re: ACTS - too many recvbufs allocated (40) (Correct the Version of ntp-dev)

Giuseppe vizio at ien.it
Mon Feb 7 15:26:41 UTC 2005

I've verified the sscanf call in refclock_acts.c and I can confirm you
that it is rigth for the PTB string format, so the problem is not in
the string parsing.


"David L. Mills" <mills at udel.edu> wrote in message news:<cu0alc$f6k$1 at dewey.udel.edu>...
> Giuseppe,
> I've heard mixed reports. In the recent integration of USNO/NIST/PTB 
> driver, the USNO and NIST formats were rigorously verified, but I could 
> not verify the PTB format. I have heard at least one report that it 
> works, then I hear your report that it doesn't. This is not hard to fix, 
> but I can't do that from here. Someone needs to look at the sscanf call 
> in the driver and compare with the PTB string actually received. The 
> rcvbuf situation should have nothing to do with a possible format 
> decoding bug.
> Dave

More information about the questions mailing list