[ntp:questions] Re: Is my ntp server ok?
Ruth Ivimey-Cook
ruth at ivimey.org
Tue Jan 18 16:11:18 UTC 2005
In article <csja13$euj$1 at canard.ulcc.ac.uk>, you say...
> Ruth Ivimey-Cook <ruth at ivimey.org> wrote:
> > other servers. I am assuming this output from ntpq is bad:
>
> You're right: no reachable servers.
>
> > But perhaps this is more encouraging? But why so few entries?
>
> Where's that one from? It's a completely different list of servers.
I ran the command from the same login and same config, but using "ntpdc" rather
than "ntpq". That's the only difference between the two.
> restrict default nomodify notrap noquery nopeer noserve
>
> and see if that helps.
It seems to have helped. ntpq now says:
ntpq> lassoc
ind assID status conf reach auth condition last_event cnt
===========================================================
1 60444 9014 yes yes none reject reachable 1
2 60445 9014 yes yes none reject reachable 1
3 60446 9014 yes yes none reject reachable 1
4 60447 9014 yes yes none reject reachable 1
5 60448 9014 yes yes none reject reachable 1
6 60449 9014 yes yes none reject reachable 1
7 60450 9014 yes yes none reject reachable 1
ntpq> peers
remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
==============================================================================
LOCAL(0) LOCAL(0) 10 l 62 64 3 0.000 0.000 0.004
stilton.pencil. valliere.ns.eas 3 u 56 64 3 21.181 41.232 0.452
gw.roaima.co.uk pth-cdns02.plus 3 u 59 64 3 52.741 41.442 18.387
ntp0.cis.strath ntp1.cis.strath 3 u 64 64 2 28.344 35.870 0.004
ntp1.sandvika.n Time1.Stupi.SE 2 u 62 64 3 18.715 42.305 103.795
veracity.mcc.ac ntp0.ja.net 2 u 50 64 3 23.524 42.165 39.129
ns.exnet.com time.nist.gov 2 u 52 64 3 33.617 32.323 37.438
... and ntpdc agrees. :-)
My only query is why is "condition" saying "reject" in lassoc output?
I hope all is now well, thanks.
Ruth
--
Ruth Ivimey-Cook
IT Engineer and Author
More information about the questions
mailing list