[ntp:questions] [Version 3 & 4] Aren't NTP stratums 17 ... 256 (1001b...11111111b) totally pointless? Why not use these extra bits for a CRC-4...
Max Power
mikehack at u.washington.edu
Sun Jun 4 00:21:35 UTC 2006
[Version 3 & 4] Aren't NTP stratums 17 ... 256 (1001b...11111111b) totally
pointless?
Why not use these extra bits for a CRC-4 ... for all the bits used in that
datafield.
At least the CRC-4 could be put to some use.
Mainly
* Only about 1% of know NTP servers are Stratum [8...16]
* The stratum hierarchy (and accuracy of a vast majority of public NTP
servers) are not policed that well, as there is no distributed NTP
application being used to find lists of dodgy NTP servers.
* The NTP time distribution system would probably work best with only 8
stratums anyway.
Will this surplus stratum problem be fixed in NTPv5?
More information about the questions
mailing list