[ntp:questions] refclock use causes core dump of ntpd

[Richard B. gilbert]

Maarten Wiltink wrote:
> "Richard B. gilbert" <rgilbert88 at comcast.net> wrote in message
> news:45DD97C3.6040800 at comcast.net...
> [...]
> 
>>Maybe there should be a specification, perhaps in the new RFC, that
>>says what to do if a refclock failure is detected.
>>
>>Marking the refclock "insane" comes to mind as a reasonable response.
> 
> 
> Congratulations, Richard. I think that's a first. Not a single
> exclamation point anywhere!
> 
> Groetjes,
> Maarten Wiltink
> 
> 

When did I ever use a SINGLE exclamation point?  ;-)