[ntp:questions] refclock use causes core dump of ntpd

Harlan Stenn stenn at ntp.isc.org
Fri Feb 23 05:40:35 UTC 2007

Personally, I think it is Wrong for a refclock to call abort(), but I
reserve the right to change my mind if I get my way and implement "design by
contract" throughout the codebase.

The problem is that there is no maintainer for that refclock and I do not
want to make things worse (and I do not want to increase my workload).


More information about the questions mailing list