[ntp:questions] Double "prefer" configuration
David L. Mills
mills at udel.edu
Mon Mar 5 16:06:50 UTC 2007
Eugen,
The prefer scheme is not designed for more than one candidate. If more
than one peer is so designated, the code chooses the last one in the
configuration file.
Dave
Eugen COCA wrote:
> After severeal hours things looks like this:
>
> ntpq> pe
> remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
> ==============================================================================
> GPS_NMEA(1) .GPS. 0 l 85h 64 0 0.000 0.000 0.004
> ptbtime1.ptb.de .PTB. 1 u 57 256 377 56.491 -0.062 0.132
> ntps1-1.cs.tu-b .PPS. 1 u 116 256 377 57.161 0.827 0.225
> ntp-p1.obspm.fr .1PPS. 1 u 65 256 373 57.027 0.541 5.938
> gps-2.mit.edu .GPS. 1 u 125 256 377 133.034 2.194 0.270
> oPPS(1) .PPS. 0 l 10 16 377 0.000 0.000 0.004
> ntp2.usv.ro .PPS. 1 u 61 64 377 0.198 0.003 0.007
> ntp3.usv.ro .PPS. 1 u 14 64 377 0.240 0.003 0.005
> ptbtime2.ptb.de .PTB. 1 u 33 256 377 55.610 1.183 0.334
> gps-1.mit.edu .GPS. 1 u 84 256 377 132.648 2.118 0.369
>
>
> Is there anybody able to emmit an oppinion if this configuration (with
> two prefer weywords) is good enough for a stable server ?
>
More information about the questions
mailing list