[ntp:questions] Leap second functional question
martin.burnicki at meinberg.de
Wed Feb 20 08:26:22 UTC 2008
Nero Imhard wrote:
> Both UTC and TAI count SI-seconds, but you seem to differentiate between
> the two. How you want to express durations "in UTC" or "in TAI" is
> unclear to me and I prefer avoid it altogether.
IMHO both UTC and TAI have their advantages, depending on the application.
While UTC is a better choice to use time stamps / calendar dates across leap
seconds (i.e Jan 1 00:00:00 = Dec 1 00:00:00 + (31*86400) TAI is preferred
if correct time _intervals_ are required, even across a leap second.
More information about the questions