[ntp:questions] Ruh, roh. Leap Second?

Nero Imhard nim at pipe.nl
Fri Jul 4 08:45:21 UTC 2008

David L. Mills schreef:

> the current version [...] does take a vote among the sources on
> whether to mark the calendar for a leap. All this is overridden if
> the NIST leapseconds file is present.

How interesting. I had a question about this in another thread. Can I
take this to mean that *if* you have configured a leapseconds file, it
will be the *only* source of information used? If yes, perhaps this
could be mentioned explicitly in the docs. I believe that is not the
case right now.


More information about the questions mailing list