[ntp:questions] SNTP server + ntpd 4.2.4 client
Noob
root at localhost.invalid
Fri Mar 14 15:46:34 UTC 2008
Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
> Noob wrote:
>
>> I've been running ntpd 4.2.4 to synchronize my system clock using
>> remote stratum 2 servers as a reference. (The RTT to these servers is
>> in the 30-50 ms range.) The accuracy is in the 1-2 ms range, based on
>> the reported offset.
>>
>> I've been asked to evaluate the following time server, in order to
>> reach a better accuracy than what the current setup provides.
>>
>> http://www.heoldesign.com/index.php?id=58
>
> That link takes me to a page advertising THREE products! Which one did
> you have in mind?
The HEOL-T101 (with a Fast Ethernet port).
>> Is it a problem that the time server only implements SNTP?
>
> It should not be a problem. The largest difference between NTP and SNTP
> is the effort to account for the vagaries of the internet!
Cool. (I'll give RFC 4330 a look.)
>> What kind of accuracy may I expect?
>
> These devices should be accurate to within the range of 25 to 100
> nanoseconds.
The spec seems to mention +/- 40 ns.
> The limiting factor will be the jitter introduced while
> getting the time into your computer.
I plan to connect my box to the time server using a cross-over cable.
(My box has 4 Ethernet ports, I will devote one to NTP traffic.) The
RTT is very stable at 80-85 µs.
> A SWAG (Scientific Wild Ass Guess) would be 500 microseconds. By
> spending a lot of time and effort you might be able to get something
> better than that. The chief difficulty would be measuring and
> controlling the delays within the computer.
I thought the error was on the order of half the RTT, i.e. I could
hope for 40-50 µs in my situation?
Regards.
More information about the questions
mailing list