[ntp:questions] A question about the NTP delay time formula
David Mills
mills at udel.edu
Thu Aug 13 14:28:34 UTC 2009
Ulrich,
Wonderfully rude of you to point that out, but you are absolutely
correct. I have no interest whatsoever in maintaining NTPv3, which so
far as I am concenred has been obsolered by NTPv4 since 1998. The IETF
has bottled up the NTPv4 spec for almost four years; I would be very
interested in errata reports on the draft, but it has been reviewed by
dozens of follks and I have responded to each and every one. As for
rfd1305, if somebody spots an errort, please report and post an errata
update. I am not interested in doing that myse.
Dave
Ulrich Windl wrote:
>Brian Utterback <brian.utterback at sun.com> writes:
>
>
>
>>When you think that there is a mistake in an RFC, it is wise to check the RFC
>>errata list at http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_list.php
>>
>>
>
>In a recent conversation with Dave about clarifications on RFC 1305 he
>said he will put no energy into setting up errata for that RFC. Just to
>let you know...
>
>Ulrich
>
>_______________________________________________
>questions mailing list
>questions at lists.ntp.org
>https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/questions
>
>
More information about the questions
mailing list