[ntp:questions] Remaining synced on an unsynchronised peer?
michael.buetow at comsoft.de
Tue Dec 1 07:27:56 UTC 2009
On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:18:11 +0000, unruh wrote:
> So why in the world do you have them listed as servers for each other if
> you do not want them acting as servers for each other?
I have no problem with them acting as servers for each other in the case
where one of them still has contact to the outside.
In fact, in that case, the other one _must_ continue to get the time from
More information about the questions