[ntp:questions] Remaining synced on an unsynchronised peer?

Michael Butow michael.buetow at comsoft.de
Tue Dec 1 07:27:56 UTC 2009


On Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:18:11 +0000, unruh wrote:

> So why in the world do you have them listed as servers for each other if
> you do not want them acting as servers for each other?

I have no problem with them acting as servers for each other in the case 
where one of them still has contact to the outside.
In fact, in that case, the other one _must_ continue to get the time from 
its partner.




More information about the questions mailing list