[ntp:questions] ntpdate
tglassey
tglassey at glassey.com
Mon Jun 15 21:54:22 UTC 2009
Danny Mayer wrote:
> Scott Haneda wrote:
>
>> On Jun 15, 2009, at 8:59 AM, Todd Glassey CISM CIFI wrote:
>>
>>
>>>> You should be running ntpd as a daemon. That will keep the clock in
>>>> synch and you never have to touch it.
>>>>
>>> Which creates an audit issue and security profile which always needs
>>> to be watched. NTPD is not the answer for everyone Danny.
>>>
>> Can you elaborate on this? I see that ntpdate and ntpd can both be made
>> to do the same thing in my case, which is a non daemonized single
>> instance setting of time.
>>
>> If I do not plan on making a daemon, and just running it once a hour on
>> schedule, as well as in a reboot of the machine after the interfaces are
>> up, what would my concerns be?
>>
>> If I do decide to run ntpd as a daemon, what audit/secuirty issues
>> should I be looking into?
>>
>> Thank you Todd.
>>
>
> He's just blowing fud.
>
> Danny
>
No Danny I was speaking from an audit perspective. No FUD here - just
reality.
Todd
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.70/2177 - Release Date: 06/15/09 05:54:00
>
>
More information about the questions
mailing list