[ntp:questions] ntpd wedged again
Dave Hart
davehart at gmail.com
Sat Feb 11 15:08:58 UTC 2012
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 09:42, A C <agcarver+ntp at acarver.net> wrote:
> On 2/11/2012 01:21, A C wrote:
>
> This is the more recent status though I'm not sure why the PPS is marked as
> bad.
>
>> remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset
>> jitter
>>
>> ==============================================================================
>> x127.127.22.0 .PPS. 0 l 5 16 377 0.000 0.002
>> 0.122
>> 127.127.28.0 .GPSD. 4 l 84 128 377 0.000 -30.840
>> 15.522
>> +69.65.40.29 209.51.161.238 2 u 36 128 377 74.436 1.585
>> 0.199
>> -169.229.70.201 169.229.128.214 3 u 111 128 377 37.326 3.009
>> 0.571
>> +198.137.202.16 69.36.224.15 2 u 111 128 377 36.641 1.851
>> 0.400
>> *130.207.165.28 130.207.244.240 2 u 95 128 377 78.266 1.667
>> 0.736
>> -131.144.4.10 130.207.244.240 2 u 40 128 377 85.358 3.798
>> 1.243
See http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/ntp/html/cluster.html with the
understanding that falsetickers (x in peer tally code in first column)
are those pruned by the cluster algorithm.
Cheers,
Dave Hart
More information about the questions
mailing list