[ntp:questions] GPS Weakness Could Sink Wireless
David Woolley
david at ex.djwhome.demon.invalid
Thu Dec 12 14:48:35 UTC 2013
On 12/12/13 13:57, John Hasler wrote:
>
> 1) Better front-end selectivity
> 2) Better front-end dynamic range
I don't really see how these help against all but the crudest jammers,
which transmit pure CW carriers or are off frequency.
> 3) Directional antennas for fixed sites such as cell towers
>
That might help a bit, if you rejected signals near the horizon (which
are good for navigation, but may be bad for time). However, to get full
benefit from directionality, you'd need to run large phased arrays and
steer their beams to track the individual satellites. As most military
users want the navigation data, they would be better off with steerable
beams.
The military also have the advantage of a broader, L2 signal, with a
cryptographic chipping code.
More information about the questions
mailing list