[ntp:questions] PPS problem

[E-Mail Sent to this address will be added to the BlackLists]

Martin Burnicki wrote:
> Dowd, Greg wrote:
>> Why not?  You really want to as the network entries will
>>   do iburst and get selected before your refclock does
>>   and force some clock stepping before settling down.
>>  I usually use maxpoll 4 as well.  The decreased jitter
>>   in the local signal makes higher poll rates both
>>   valid and useful.
>
> I'd also suggest to use iburst also for refclocks.
>  However, if I remember correctly then at least some
>  refclock drivers are acting anyway as if iburst had
>  been specified.

<http://bugs.ntp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=767>

-- 
E-Mail Sent to this address <BlackList at Anitech-Systems.com>
  will be added to the BlackLists.