[ntp:questions] server and peer lines correct?
stenn at ntp.org
Sun Apr 6 22:37:48 UTC 2014
"Jason Rabel" writes:
> Charles Swiger wrote:
> > Don't bother using more than one iburst entry per server.
> I think your wording is a little confusing. Are you saying only use
> iburst on one remote server and not all of them?
I'm curious about this as well. iburst is your friend.
> I was reading the NTP docs last night and came across a couple
> interesting notes. First it says not to use iburst with peer lines.
The assoc.html page says:
The <tt>burst</tt> and <tt>iburst</tt> options should not be used in
symmetric modes, as this can upset the intended symmetry of the
protocol and result in spurious duplicate or dropped messages.
At one point I remember that FLAG_IBURST was ignored for peers, but I
don't see that now from a quick glance at the code.
Harlan Stenn <stenn at ntp.org>
http://networktimefoundation.org - be a member!
More information about the questions