[ntp:questions] LOCL clock reachability not 377?
Harlan Stenn
stenn at ntp.org
Sat Aug 23 10:05:30 UTC 2014
Rob writes:
> Harlan Stenn <stenn at ntp.org> wrote:
> > Rob,
> >
> > You have seen 'flag1' in the recent ntp-dev SHM driver documentation,
> > right?
>
> I have installed ntp-dev and as part of that also ntp-dev-doc, but
> it is essentially empty (only an automatically generated changelog).
It's in the source distribution, html/drivers/driver28.html
> There appears to be a package ntp-doc-dev on the site, but I cannot
> install it as my system is 64-bit and the repository cannot be installed
> on it. I can only install the source repository and apparently the
> doc package is in the binary repository.
>
> Who still has those i386 systems out there? Why doesn't ntp-dev
> support 64-bit??
No idea what you mean there - we do 64-bit builds (under linux and other
OSes) all the time. You might want to check with whoever handles
building packages for your distro.
> Anyway, I checked the ntpd/refclock_shm.c source and I cannot find
> any reference to flag1 in there. So I'm lost. What is the magic?
This will be post-4.2.7p462 . See the shm_control() stuff, which starts
about line 232.
H
More information about the questions
mailing list