[ntp:questions] Restrict statements and the "pool" directive

David Woolley david at ex.djwhome.demon.invalid
Sun Dec 21 20:58:35 UTC 2014


On 21/12/14 20:10, Rob wrote:
> What I got from the documentation is that without "nopeer" a server
> could setup a "peer" association.  I don't like that.

No. Without nopeer, a *client* can't set up a peer session.  If you are 
using a system as a server, it cannot cause you more disruption than if 
it peered itself with you.

The problem here is that the exact significance of being a peer isn't 
well documented.



More information about the questions mailing list