[ntp:questions] Thoughts on KOD

John Hasler jhasler at newsguy.com
Tue Jul 8 03:12:04 UTC 2014


I wrote:
> Would it be useful to offer an "official" minimal implementation
> intended for embedded systems so that these people won't feel the need
> to code their own?  Maybe add minimal NTP support to Busybox?

Brian Inglis writes:
> AIUI an updated v4 sntp client will be released to replace ntpdate.
> How about specifying the sntp core as an RFC for an embedded NTP
> client?

That would be even better.  Designers could then claim they "have to"
use it to be standards compliant.

-- 
John Hasler 
jhasler at newsguy.com
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA



More information about the questions mailing list