[ntp:questions] Thoughts on KOD

John Hasler jhasler at newsguy.com
Tue Jul 8 03:12:04 UTC 2014

I wrote:
> Would it be useful to offer an "official" minimal implementation
> intended for embedded systems so that these people won't feel the need
> to code their own?  Maybe add minimal NTP support to Busybox?

Brian Inglis writes:
> AIUI an updated v4 sntp client will be released to replace ntpdate.
> How about specifying the sntp core as an RFC for an embedded NTP
> client?

That would be even better.  Designers could then claim they "have to"
use it to be standards compliant.

John Hasler 
jhasler at newsguy.com
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI USA

More information about the questions mailing list