[ntp:questions] LOCL clock reachability not 377?
Rob
nomail at example.com
Wed Jul 30 09:00:06 UTC 2014
mike cook <michael.cook at sfr.fr> wrote:
>
> Paradoxically , the LCL clock is fine when there are no refclocks. That is, when you don't need or want it.
>
> remote refid st t when poll reach delay offset jitter
> ==============================================================================
> *127.127.1.1 .LOCL. 5 l 8 64 377 0.000 0.000 0.008
> +192.168.1.4 .PPS1. 1 u 5 16 377 0.900 -0.022 0.030
> +192.168.1.23 .GPS. 1 u 23 64 377 0.804 -0.134 0.017
Maybe someone tried to handle that condition and had the sense of
the test the wrong way around???
More information about the questions
mailing list