[ntp:questions] LOCL clock reachability not 377?

Rob nomail at example.com
Wed Jul 30 09:00:06 UTC 2014


mike cook <michael.cook at sfr.fr> wrote:
>
> Paradoxically , the LCL clock is fine when there are no refclocks. That is, when you don't need or want it.
>
>      remote           refid      st t when poll reach   delay   offset  jitter
> ==============================================================================
> *127.127.1.1     .LOCL.           5 l    8   64  377    0.000    0.000   0.008
> +192.168.1.4     .PPS1.           1 u    5   16  377    0.900   -0.022   0.030
> +192.168.1.23    .GPS.            1 u   23   64  377    0.804   -0.134   0.017

Maybe someone tried to handle that condition and had the sense of
the test the wrong way around???



More information about the questions mailing list