[ntp:questions] leap second warning bits in practice

Miroslav Lichvar mlichvar at redhat.com
Wed May 13 11:23:43 UTC 2015

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 11:44:37AM +0200, Marco Marongiu wrote:
> I understand that the leap second is not armed in the kernel if only the
> warning is set. Rather, it seems that the warning is used by a client to
> understand if it should believe its upstreams when they claim there will
> be a leap second by this month.
> I think my interpretation is correct but I'd really appreciate if
> someone could either confirm or clarify, so that I/we know exactly what
> to expect.

I'm not sure what exactly are you asking here. Do you see in your
testing or the source code something different from what is described
in the document?

Miroslav Lichvar

More information about the questions mailing list