[ntp:questions] ✘interface/nic

[Marco Marongiu]

On 03/04/17 23:54, Gary E. Miller wrote:
>> I used interface ignore and then bound ntpd to specific interfaces on
>> LVS servers. This was because virtual interfaces were continuously
>> created and destroyed on those servers, ntpd had to continuosly run
>> after the change and sometimes it got... "confused" and eventually
>> stopped serving time.
> Interesting.  That is new data.  Maybe file a bug?

I can't, as I am not working in the same environment now.


>> Since I wanted the service to be provided only on specific addresses,
>> I forced ntpd to ignore all interfaces but the loopback and the ones
>> where those addresses were bound to.
> Yeah, I get the address thing, but using nic/interface as a workaround
> to a bug in enlightening.

Hmmm... I'll take it as a compliment :-D


>> Hope this helps. Why do you want to know exactly?
> A friend of mine has been looking at the code and scratching his head
> about it.

Got it. Thanks

Ciao
-- M