[ntp:bugs] [Bug 366] refclock_parse/refclock_atom problems in latest dev

[bugzilla at ntp.org]

http://bugzilla.ntp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366





------- Additional Comments From stenn at ntp.org  2004-12-10 19:21 -------
Subject: Re: [ntp:rc-parse]  refclock_parse/refclock_atom problems in latest dev 

Good catch on refclock_atom.c.

Should we use:

#ifdef HAVE_PPSAPI
# include "ppsapi_timepps.h"
#endif

and not bother with HAVE_PPSAPI checking in ppsapi_timepps.h, or should
the HAVE_PPSPAI "protection" go into ppsapi_timepps.h and we simply:

#include "ppsapi_timepps.h"

in the code?

H





------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.