[ntp:bugs] [Bug 366] refclock_parse/refclock_atom problems in latest dev

[bugzilla at ntp.org]

http://bugzilla.ntp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=366





------- Additional Comments From stenn at ntp.org  2004-12-10 20:07 -------
Subject: Re: [ntp:bugs]  refclock_parse/refclock_atom problems in latest dev 

Yes.  We agree on those points.

I'm inclined to use:

 #ifdef HAVE_PPSAPI
 # incude whatever
 #endif

at this point.  I'll do it later today unless somebody finds a reason
to "go the other way".

H





------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.