[ntp:hackers] gcc question
Harlan Stenn
stenn at whimsy.udel.edu
Mon Jul 28 19:30:31 PDT 2003
OK, maybe I'm being a Big Idiot here. Please help me.
I'm trying to figure out why gcc (at least) hasn't been complaining
about the difference between the prototype declaration of pps_sample and
the places in the code where it is "used" with different arguments,
without complaint.
In particular, I see:
...
extern int pps_sample (l_fp *);
...
{
...
(void) pps_sample(peer, &stamp);
...
}
What am I missing here? gcc-2.95.3, at least...
Harlan
More information about the hackers
mailing list