[ntp:hackers] Re: magnitudes for ntpq variables

todd glassey todd.glassey at worldnet.att.net
Fri Mar 31 16:26:06 UTC 2006

My point exactly - I wanted to apologize to the list for also only being
capable of saying "I bitch and moan at you" and I would like to pay some
dues therein.

let me reassert that NTP is VERY VERY VERY important to the larger picture
of creating a sense of portability in trust models... and so gee, I would be
a fool as an auditor to not want to participate.

So once again, the offer of service is on the table. If this Group as a
Collective is willing to specify a set of particular formats for NTP
documents, I will volunteer - to make those appear or update those already
out there in a timely manner.

My hope also is that this will allow me to convince you folks that a formal
BCP for NTP is really the next step in getting NTP standardized.

Anyway - the offer is still on the table.

Todd Glassey

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Steve Kostecke" <kostecke at ntp.isc.org>
To: <hackers at support.ntp.org>
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 8:04 AM
Subject: Re: [ntp:hackers] Re: magnitudes for ntpq variables

> "David J Taylor" said:
> >We've already seen this with the Wiki format for some of the NTP
> >documents, where an ill-defined, unfriendly and obscure user interface
> >is preventing all but a few folks from adding to the knowledge base.
> >And we spend more time arguing about that than it would take to update
> >the documents!
> I can't recall YOU ever contributing anything other than criticism of
> our efforts.
> -- 
> Steve Kostecke <kostecke at ntp.isc.org>
> NTP Public Services Project http://ntp.isc.org/
> Public Key at http://ntp.isc.org/Users/SteveKostecke
> _______________________________________________
> hackers mailing list
> hackers at support.ntp.org
> https://support.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/hackers

More information about the hackers mailing list