[ntp:hackers] Further to the timestamping issue
tglassey at earthlink.net
Wed Jun 18 23:48:47 UTC 2008
----- Original Message -----
From: "David L. Mills" <mills at udel.edu>
To: <hackers at ntp.org>; <ntpwg at lists.ntp.org>
Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2008 7:08 AM
Subject: Re: [ntp:hackers] Further to the timestamping issue
> It might not be clear from the documentation, as most folks might
> consider it an overly pedantic issue, but there is a serious formal
> model here. I consider three disciplined oscillators with respect to a
> primary server. First is the remote source, such as the WWV antenna.
> Second is the local reference oscillator in the GPS receiver or in the
> WWV case the audio codec. Third is the system clock disciplined by NTP.
> The device driver interface design is intended to allow contributions
> from the first two sources to be budgeted.
meaning that while the budgeted sources are weighted in how they are applied
the OS Clock is not and this is the core problem with a Software Only Clock
I would propose that NTP doesnt really need to be tied to a SW only clock
and in fact the NTP Server Package and not the NTP protocol is what ties it
to a SW based clock model.
That said, it seems totally reasonable that in instances where there is an
embedded HW based timekeeping system like a 1588MC or similar, that the NTP
calls should be able to point to it rather than only getting time off the
local host-based OS Clock through the local NTP Service Daemon.
More information about the hackers