[ntp:hackers] unconfigure

Todd Glassey CISM CIFI tglassey at earthlink.net
Sun Jun 7 16:23:52 UTC 2009


David Mills wrote:
> Danny,
>
> The original plan when the new configuration code was built was to use 
> an initeger (association ID) or IP address or DNS name if it exists. 
We should add a Mac Address as well and possibly a BERT token to 
represent the end node since these would also help to enable NAT 
functionality, something that NTP currently chokes on.
> The 
> server, peer and unconfig commands would all take one of these forms. If 
> the association already existed, the options would be applied; if not, 
> it woulo be created.Usual error checking applies. It gets a little 
> tricky, as the syntax tree has to be edited/storage recovered, etc.
>
> Dave
>
> Danny Mayer wrote:
>
>   
>> Harlan Stenn wrote:
>>  
>>
>>     
>>> I can see that we'd want to support "unconfig -[46] dom.ain" as well.
>>>
>>> Now to figure out how to specify the associd to the command, as I'd
>>> rather not create a new command for that (like "unassoc").
>>>    
>>>
>>>       
>> I disagree with this one. Everyone knows how to get the address. associd
>> is a much harder proposition and I'm not sure how it would really be
>> different in any useful way from ip address.
>>
>> Danny
>>
>>  
>>
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> hackers mailing list
> hackers at lists.ntp.org
> https://lists.ntp.org/mailman/listinfo/hackers
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com 
> Version: 8.5.339 / Virus Database: 270.12.54/2159 - Release Date: 06/06/09 18:04:00
>
>   



More information about the hackers mailing list