[ntp:hackers] SIGIO and fuzz

Harlan Stenn stenn at ntp.org
Tue Aug 13 23:11:29 UTC 2013

In http://bugs.ntp.org/show_bug.cgi?id=2433 Frank Kardel notes that we
can change from a low-impact runtime check to a no-impact compile-time
check, and in examining this situation he noted that we only "fuzz" the
time if we are *not* using signaled I/O.

I talked with Dave Mills about this, and he can't remember why this
might have been a good idea, and thinks we should probably always "fuzz"
the time.

Does anybody know a reason we should leave the current behavior alone?

Harlan Stenn <stenn at ntp.org>
http://networktimefoundation.org  - be a member!

More information about the hackers mailing list