[ntp:hackers] hackers] Post 4.2.8 Release Number Scheme
TGLASSEY
tglassey at earthlink.net
Fri Jan 3 00:54:32 UTC 2014
Isnt it always NTP here?
In this model Harlen would that carry forward so 5.x internally to this
environment is actually really called dot x?
So the sub-level in the first instance below is NTP4 version 2.6 (aka
4.2.6)... this simplifies the process as long as you are willing to deal
with ntp4 vs ntp5 as potentially differing protocols.
Todd
On 1/2/2014 4:42 PM, Harlan Stenn wrote:
> Greg Troxel writes:
>> Harlan Stenn <stenn at ntp.org> writes:
>>
>>> Cutting a release means:
>>>
>>> ntp-dev-4.2.5pNNN-RC gets some changes to packageinfo.sh and becomes
>>> ntp-4.2.6 in the -stable repo.
>>>
>>> After that release fully rolls I pull -stable into -dev, and make some
>>> changes to packageinfo.sh in ntp-dev and release ntp-dev-4.2.7p0.
>> Earlier you said that the package name was "ntp4", following the example
>> on the wiki, but here it is "ntp".
> Yes, I gave examples of what we have been doing, so folks would have an
> easier time understanding it.
>
> ntp-4.2.6p3 would be ntp4-2.6.3 in the new scheme - the values should
> translate quite easily. Similarly, ntp-dev-4.2.7p300 would be
> ntp4-dev-2.7.300 .
>
> H
> _______________________________________________
> hackers mailing list
> hackers at lists.ntp.org
> http://lists.ntp.org/listinfo/hackers
>
>
--
-------------
Personal Email - Disclaimers Apply
More information about the hackers
mailing list