[ntpwg] Updated draft

Danny Mayer mayer at ntp.isc.org
Sun Feb 11 13:51:40 PST 2007

That's exactly what I wanted. Otherwise I would have opposed it going
forward with it obsoleting RFC 4330. I think I'll start reviewing your
edited version instead.


David L. Mills wrote:
> 3. The SNTP protocol subset now has a separate section. The implementer 
> wishing to build SNTP can avoid eye fatigue with the full NTP prose.

More information about the ntpwg mailing list