[ntpwg] Updated draft
David L. Mills
mills at udel.edu
Mon Feb 12 16:26:15 PST 2007
The document is now restored. The Windwoes name was in upper case; the
Unix link in lower case. Sign.
There is no provision for Autokey in the standards document. In
prinicple there could be, but it doesn't seem useful to add all that
baggage and not make a NTP-conformant version. I'm happy to add that
option to the SNTP text if this seems desirable.
Chen Helen-A12587 wrote:
> Danny, David,
> The link I tried (draft-ietf-ntp-ntpv4-proto-04) didn't work. I would
> like to know if SNTPv4 includes the sutokey algorithm, or if the autokey
> can only be implemented in NTPv4.
> Helen Chen
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ntpwg-bounces+helen.y.chen=motorola.com at support.ntp.org
> [mailto:ntpwg-bounces+helen.y.chen=motorola.com at support.ntp.org] On
> Behalf Of Danny Mayer
> Sent: Sunday, February 11, 2007 3:52 PM
> To: David L. Mills
> Cc: ntpwg at ntp.isc.org
> Subject: Re: [ntpwg] Updated draft
> That's exactly what I wanted. Otherwise I would have opposed it going
> forward with it obsoleting RFC 4330. I think I'll start reviewing your
> edited version instead.
> David L. Mills wrote:
>> 3. The SNTP protocol subset now has a separate section. The
>> implementer wishing to build SNTP can avoid eye fatigue with the full
> NTP prose.
> ntpwg mailing list
> ntpwg at support.ntp.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the ntpwg