[ntpwg] Autokey refilihng - my point...
Todd Glassey
tglassey at earthlink.net
Mon Oct 26 15:26:31 UTC 2009
Stewart Bryant wrote:
>
>> Since autokey has already passed Working Group review, it would have to
>> be pulled back to the working group to change the protocol and then
>> resubmitted to IESG.
>>
>>
> It would also need to go for IETF LC before it went to the IESG.
>
> Given where the document is, the best strategy would be to continue
> with Informational.
No its not. But I am betting you have a financial interest in keeping
NTP where it is considering the pain you will have to go through with
IOS to fix them.
> That can only reduce the time taken to PS. The issues Brian raises are
> real, and need to be
> addressed before a PS can be published, and the sooner the process of
> starting to address
> then starts, the sooner it will finish.
Then no one can use NTP with AutoKEY in production Stewart if they are
regulated and one of their security controls is 'that only vetted and
tested technologies are used in their IT' department. You know Sorta
like your company Cisco does Stewart... If you doubt me ask the
compliance director over at corporate. I will forward you the number off
list.
Todd
>
> - Stewart
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 8.5.423 / Virus Database: 270.14.32/2459 - Release Date: 10/25/09 19:57:00
>
>
More information about the ntpwg
mailing list