[time] Request for comments!
Adrian von Bidder
avbidder
Sat May 8 14:27:53 UTC 2010
Hi,
On Sunday 02 May 2010 16.01:58 Arturo 'Buanzo' Busleiman wrote:
> http://queue.acm.org/detail.cfm?id=1773943
Posting an abstract here and explaining why you're requesting comments and
what you intend to do with the comments (will there be a revised version of
the text?) would be helpful. Starting to read the article, I don't quickly
see what's the point of the whole text and who's the target group, so I
stopped reading it.
Sorry, no comments to the actual content.
cheers
-- vbi
--
The idea is that you can only get in trouble for what you actually did.
What a concept.
-- Pam Jones, Groklaw
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 389 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://fortytwo.ch/mailman/pipermail/timekeepers/attachments/20100508/33e5954c/attachment.pgp>
More information about the pool
mailing list