[ntp:questions] Re: Which public servers for adjustment?
helmut at wollmersdorfer.at
Mon Dec 20 23:44:01 UTC 2004
Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
> Helmut Wollmersdorfer wrote:
> I'd suggest calibrating against the servers with the lowest delay and
> jitter and comparing with the calculated propagation delays from DCF77,
> MSF60, and HBG75
Thx, that's what I wanted to know.
> If you need better time than that your options are to make GPS an option
> somehow or to buy a rubidium or cesium frequency standard with a clock
> option and have it calibrated by your national standards laboratory!
For me its more like a hobby than a need. Maybe a oncore GPS in fixed
position mode and 1-3 satellites visible will give more accuracy and a
used rubidium standard would be nice. But first I want to tune my
> I would not use "prefer" unless you are much closer to one of your radio
> sources than to the other two.
The distance from Vienna/Austria is approximately
DCF ... 590 km, earthwaves, stable signal
HBG ... 788 km, interferences depending on weather etc.
MSF ... 1400 km, skywaves, signal run drifts around a little bit (<1ms)
In normal use "prefer" DCF makes IMHO sense, as it has the smallest
jitter followed by the similar configured peer in the LAN.
More information about the questions