[ntp:questions] Re: Clock type 30 invalid?
stenn at maccarony.ntp.org
Thu Jan 22 06:30:23 UTC 2004
In article <GKydnWUo-9g1zZLdRVn-iQ at comcast.com>,
Richard B. Gilbert <rgilbert88 at comcast.net> wrote:
>Where does it say that the the PPSAPI is required?
Line 87 of refclock_oncore.c .
>Looking at the code, I see a lot of #ifdef HAVE_PPSAPI statements.
>Don't these mean that IF you have PPSAPI you do A otherwise you do B?
>I also don't see where timepps.h is required. It's that #ifdef again;
>if you have it, do A, else do B.
That's because HAVE_PPSAPI does not tell us which header to use. If we
HAVE_PPSAPI then we expect a timepps.h header and trust that one will
If you remove the offending bit from the end of line 87 and the result
works for you, please open an issue at http://bugzilla.ntp.org and I
expect we'll get this fixed pronto.
More information about the questions