[ntp:questions] Re: Ref clocks and polling intervals
stenn at maccarony.ntp.org
Sat Nov 27 06:33:58 UTC 2004
In article <e426e73c.0411250356.59a40ec7 at posting.google.com>,
dusty bin <junkmail at mmscomms.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>[aside] would it not be useful to allow iburst with refclocks - it
>doesn't seem to do anything here...
That's the point - using iburst with refclocks does nothing.
A number of us would like to use it to mean "initially get the time the
refclock tells us ASAP."
Or do I misunderstand you?
More information about the questions