[ntp:questions] Re: Ref clocks and polling intervals
David L. Mills
mills at udel.edu
Sat Nov 27 15:29:11 UTC 2004
The burst functions conflict with some reference clock drivers which use
it for other purposes.
Harlan Stenn wrote:
> In article <e426e73c.0411250356.59a40ec7 at posting.google.com>,
> dusty bin <junkmail at mmscomms.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>>[aside] would it not be useful to allow iburst with refclocks - it
>>doesn't seem to do anything here...
> That's the point - using iburst with refclocks does nothing.
> A number of us would like to use it to mean "initially get the time the
> refclock tells us ASAP."
> Or do I misunderstand you?
More information about the questions