[ntp:questions] Re: Ref clocks and polling intervals

dusty bin junkmail at mmscomms.demon.co.uk
Sat Nov 27 18:07:22 UTC 2004

stenn at maccarony.ntp.org (Harlan Stenn) wrote in message news:<co974m$fca$1 at dewey.udel.edu>...

> A number of us would like to use it to mean "initially get the time the
> refclock tells us ASAP."
> Or do I misunderstand you?

No misunderstanding - that's exactly what I meant by using iburst with
refclocks.  I've only just started using a refclock and it seemed
slightly strange that it now takes longer to start serving time after
a restart unless I iburst on another server.

More information about the questions mailing list