[ntp:questions] Re: Can you test my server please.
brad at stop.mail-abuse.org
Tue Nov 30 23:57:44 UTC 2004
At 2:49 PM -0800 2004-11-30, Danny Mayer wrote:
> I'm not saying that. I'm saying the the protocol already supports
> the transfer of authentication packets so it's just a matter of
> extending things on both ends to get the server to authenticate
> the client.
Ahh, okay. This wasn't clear to me from your previous message.
> This has nothing to do with pool. The server shouldn't be in the
> pool if it requires client authentication.
We've been talking about things that pool server operators can do
to try and reduce the abuse of their systems. If pool servers
shouldn't require client authentication, then we don't have to worry
about whether or not the feature is present or not.
If you have any other ideas of things that the pool server
operators could do to try and protect themselves against misbehaving
clients (which ignore KOD, etc...), I'd love to see what you've got
Brad Knowles, <brad at stop.mail-abuse.org>
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755
SAGE member since 1995. See <http://www.sage.org/> for more info.
More information about the questions