[ntp:questions] Re: sendto(220.127.116.11): Invalid argument
brad at stop.mail-abuse.org
Sat Aug 13 20:43:45 UTC 2005
At 8:55 PM +0100 2005-08-13, David Woolley wrote:
>> I guess, the best solution waiting for next ntpd release, as described
>> by Steve Kostecke, is to have my local ntpd server for my local network
>> be "inside" the network without any dynamic IP address.
> Note that I believe that the proposed solution is to either periodically
> scan for new interfaces or to scan when a server fails.
Personally, I think you probably need to do both. You need to
periodically rescan the interfaces, in case a new interface has been
added but no old ones have gone away, and you need to also detect
when old ones have disappeared.
Brad Knowles, <brad at stop.mail-abuse.org>
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755
SAGE member since 1995. See <http://www.sage.org/> for more info.
More information about the questions