[ntp:questions] Re: drifting on crystal
marc at fordson.demon.co.uk
Thu Jan 13 06:33:51 UTC 2005
On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 20:58:22 -0500, "Richard B. Gilbert"
<rgilbert88 at comcast.net> wrote:
> A well designed quartz frequency
>standard is capable of outperforming the hardware of a computer clock
>which, typically, represents an investment of about $2 US on the part of
>the computer manufacturer!!
That's the hardware cost. How many watts does it consume? Cooling a PC is hard
enough nowadays; why would an engineer include a component with "oven" in its
name if he didn't have to? Also, how many people really need that level of
accuracy? If hundreds of millions of PCs are consuming watts they don't need,
that's wasteful on a pretty grand scale.
More information about the questions