[ntp:questions] Re: announce: NTP FAQ v3.8
brad at stop.mail-abuse.org
Fri Jan 21 12:21:16 UTC 2005
At 11:59 AM +0000 2005-01-21, David J Taylor wrote:
> PPM is a standard measure, yes, but not the others.
That was my point.
> For accurate work
> beyond that I think you need to use scientific notation.
Which is what Ulrich did.
> Do you think
> 10^-12 or 10E-12 is more widely understood?
I'm not certain. If I had to guess, I'd say the latter. But at
least there's another option, if you think that people find that
> By the way: in the VMS operating system one time unit was expressed in
Shall we express distances in atto-parsecs? Maybe talk about
time in the realm of femto-eons? We can get really silly, if you
However, I think the point of this discussion was to try to come
up with better ways to express the small values that Ulrich was
talking about, without getting away from standard terminology.
Brad Knowles, <brad at stop.mail-abuse.org>
"Those who would give up essential Liberty, to purchase a little
temporary Safety, deserve neither Liberty nor Safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin (1706-1790), reply of the Pennsylvania
Assembly to the Governor, November 11, 1755
SAGE member since 1995. See <http://www.sage.org/> for more info.
More information about the questions