[ntp:questions] Re: announce: NTP FAQ v3.8

John R. Ackermann N8UR jra at febo.com
Fri Jan 21 16:20:46 UTC 2005

Brad Knowles wrote:

>     However, I think the point of this discussion was to try to come up 
> with better ways to express the small values that Ulrich was talking 
> about, without getting away from standard terminology.

For what it's worth, in the precise time/frequency community straight 
scientific notation is normally used for frequency offsets and time 
differences.  PPM is mainly used in (relatively) non-precision applications.

Common expressions of a frequency error might be 1.5x10e-10, or "1.5 
parts in 10e10" though that second usage is more common in speech than 
in formal writing.  In both cases, superscripts are used if available.


More information about the questions mailing list