[ntp:questions] Re: radioclk DCF doubling
Serge Bets
serge.bets at NOSPAM.laposte.invalid
Mon Jul 18 13:15:30 UTC 2005
On Sunday, July 10, 2005 at 8:19:32 PM +0100, David Woolley wrote:
> It is a fundamental consequence of physically realisable filters that
> they introduce delays
Much thanks for the explanations, David. I more or less understood.
>> pulses that should be in theory 100 ms (or 200 ms), when seen by
>> "radioclk -t" are always shorter, around 92.9 ms (or 190 ms).
> The logic slicing level isn't exactly 50% of the peak to peak range.
Sorry again I feel I don't understand. Do you mean the unfair duration
of low amplitude pulse being only 10% of a period, while high amplitude
is 90%, makes the filter detect faster one edge than the other?
Serge.
--
Serge point Bets arobase laposte point net
More information about the questions
mailing list