[ntp:questions] Re: Router Vendor + NTP
David L. Mills
mills at udel.edu
Sat Jun 11 17:03:41 UTC 2005
http://www.eecis.udel.edu/~mills/database/rfc/rfc-xxxx.pdf. The document
in Postel ASCII has been on the RFC Editor's queue for almost two years.
Richard B. Gilbert wrote:
> David Woolley wrote:
>> In article <vb6dnYDyKeaUeTXfRVn-3A at comcast.com>,
>> Richard B. Gilbert <rgilbert88 at comcast.net> wrote:
>>> If you are using either the NTP or SNTP protocols, you should obtain
>>> copies of the appropriate RFCs and make sure that you comply with
>> There are no RFCs for the current NTP. This has long been a bone of
>> contention. Basically Dave Mills has been refusing to produce a version
>> without greek letters, mathematical operator symbols, and non-ASCII
>> art diagrams.
> There is a document on Dave's web page which would be an RFC if certain
> people didn't insist on a plain ASCII text format. It's entirely
> usable even if it lacks the blessing of the RFC Editor(s). If Dave
> says that's the standard, that's the standard!!!!!
> There is an RFC for SNTP though I don't have its number at my finger tips.
More information about the questions