[ntp:questions] Re: Router Vendor + NTP
mayer at gis.net
Mon Jun 13 16:33:12 UTC 2005
I wasn't referring to your web pages, I was referring to the official
IETF RFC documents which lists RFC 2030 as the SNTP RFC and is marked
----- Original Message Follows -----
> The SNTP document on the web page is not the official submission,
> which in fact was converted to Postel ASCII and has been sitting on
> the RFC Editor's desk for almost two years. You might be thinking
> about the Autokey document, which has not been converted and refused
> submission in PDF format. I'm not going to worry about that.
> Eventually the IETF will have no choice in the matter, as the IEEE
> and ACM and just about every archive in the world is PDF.
> mayer wrote:
> >>There is a document on Dave's web page which would be an RFC if
> >>certain people didn't insist on a plain ASCII text format. It's
> >>entirely usable even if it lacks the blessing of the RFC Editor(s).
> >>If Dave says that's the standard, that's the standard!!!!!
> > No, just because one person says what it should be doesn't make it
> > so. Welcome to the standards world. That's one of the main reasons
> > for setting up the IETF NTP working group.
> >>There is an RFC for SNTP though I don't have its number at my finger
> > RFC 2030.
> > Danny
> questions mailing list
> questions at lists.ntp.isc.org
More information about the questions